More Than Fireworks, the REAL truth about the 4th of July

On a friend’s Facebook status update today she said that 58% of Americans do not know the true meaning of the Fourth of July, aka, Independence Day. Naturally many people were outraged by her status and it made me want to dig a little deeper. The study that she was referring to was done by a Marist Poll. This study found that:

• 58% of Americans new that America declared independence in 1776
• 26% were unsure of when America declared independence.
• 16% mentioned another date.
• Only 31% of people under 30 answered the correct date. 
• 25% of individuals polled did not know which country America declared independence from.

Those numbers are alarming because it seems that America declaring independence from Great Britain in 1776 should be something all American citizens should know. As I surfed the net to learn more, I found a wonderful video by Mark Dice showcasing how clueless some people really are about the 4^th of July, I couldn’t help but ask myself,  what else is unknown about the 4^th of July?

Declaration Signing

People who do know that we are celebrating the US independence from Great Britain probably have visions of all of the signers of the Declaration of Independence on July 4^th, 1776 in the sweltering DC heat and humidity, Thomas Jefferson standing over it with a “so what do you think” look on his face, and everyone patting one another on the back.  Maybe that’s not what you envisioned, but that is how I’ve always pictured it. In all actuality independence was declared on July 2^nd, not the 4^th. Twelve of the thirteen colonies agreed to the declaration on the 4th, however, actual signing didn’t even happen at all during the month of July. It began in August, with John Hancock’s famously huge signature, and wrapping up in late November. The Declaration of Independence was signed by 56 men In Philadelphia more than likely. So, my picture was so wrong.  

The Holiday

We all know what the 4^th of July means fireworks, parades, barbeques, camping, patriotism, friends, family, and fun!!! July 4^th became a federal national holiday in 1941. Celebrations have always consisted of fireworks, food, parades, patriotism, and fun. Most recently we honor veterans and those serving in the military.

Fun Facts

Truthfully, finding accurate facts about the 4^th of July was difficult. Most “facts” about July 4^th are not “facts” at all, mostly folk lore that we may have taken to be truths. However, I found some of these facts to be very interesting.

•  US population in 1776 was 2.5 Million; today the population is 311.7 Million.
• $190.7 Million in fireworks are imported from China yearly to the US.
• Thomas Jefferson and John Adams died on the same July 4, 1826.
• The United States of America is 235 years young this July 4^th. 
• The largest firework display for 2011 is Macy’s Firework Spectacular in New York, NY. Luckily anyone can watch this display on NBC.

Patriotism

Being patriotic is a popular theme, obviously, on the 4^th of July.  People love to say they are patriotic, but know very little about patriotism. Being patriotic is more than simply waving a flag, thanking the troops, and saying you love the USA. Without a doubt all of those activities are very important and have their place. However, just as this blog post points out that a good portion of Americans are uninformed about the history of the USA. Additionally I would hazard a guess that many are clueless about current events happening in the USA. It is important to remember that being informed means being patriotic. A fun easy way to be informed about what is happening with our government, legislators, and feelings of fellow Americans is to join http://thevotereffect.com. Not only do you become informed, but you also have the opportunity to vote on issues and bills. Once you vote for a bill your vote is sent onto your elected official so that they are made aware of how you would vote on that bill. This site is patriotic in an authentic way that is revolutionizing politics in America. Join today, it is fun and free.

http://modernsurvivalblog.com/lessons-from-history/americans-ignorant-of-july-4th-history/

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/07/110704-fourth-of-july-myths-google-doodle-nation-independence-day/

Could Huntsman be the Man?

Former Utah Governor, diplomat, businessman, husband, and father Jon Huntsman announced last week that he was officially going to be the 8th person to become a GOP candidate for the President of the United States of America. He announced to a small crowd in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty with his wife of 28 years and children present. He was the picture of presidential. His speech was careful and positive.

He pointed out that “The deck is stacked against Americans due to no fault of their own.” He points out that we are passing a country down that is less powerful, confident, compassionate, and competitive to the next generation. He chastises stating that this is “un-American.” He calls America to return to being a “teacher in society” and calls for energy independence. He addressed many of the issues important to most Americans including healthcare, medicare, and the economy.

What he didn’t mention, until the end, was the name Barack Obama. He worked for him as the ambassador to China from 2009-2011. This is especially interesting because it gives him the edge on the other candidates because it is foreign experience as well as a position that will help him to appeal to moderates, and possibly conservative democrats. Not only did he work for Barack Obama, he also worked for Regan, Bush, and W. Bush. He has foreign experience, domestic experience, political experience, and bipartisan experience.

What he did mention was that he has respect for the President, and his fellow GOP candidates. He plans “to take the high road, and not run down someone’s name to win.” He noted that he and the president have a difference in opinions, but calls for people to choose who they believe is the “better president, not the better American. “

Huntsman will without a doubt be compared to Romney. The parallels are as numerous as the comparisons of Bachmann to Palin. They both have that “presidential look,” Mormon faith, former governors, independently wealthy, and fiscally conservative. However, Romney didn’t have the success that Huntsman did as governor. During his time as governor Huntsman enjoyed a 90% approval rating and left office with an 80% approval rating. His state experienced strong of economic growth during his term, making Utah one of the top three states to do business in. His experiences as governor proved to be much more positive than that of Romney’s. Of all the candidates Romney and Huntsman stand out as the most centrist and presidential. However, this will be a real test of separation of church and state for voters. It will be challenging for a Mormon to be elected as president. The bulk of the conservative base happens to be Christian of some sort. Religion is going to be a big challenge for Huntsman.

Undoubtedly Huntsman had one of the best announcement speeches. He appeared to be authentic, sincere, positive, and gave his position on issues rather than tearing down the President or his opponents. However a risk for Huntsman is appearing as the status quo from Washington. He’s had a vast amount of experience in many different administrations, but will that hurt him? Currently an issue at http://thevotereffect.com is, Does Huntsman excite you as a presidential candidate? Go to the site, become a member, and vote now!






Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Bachmann Watch

Chances are four years ago you didn’t have a clue who Michelle Bachmann even was, let alone that she even existed. She entered US House of Representatives in 2006 as the first woman Republican from Minnesota. Who would have thought that a woman from up north would make such waves in the political world? I guess that is a scene we’ve seen before. The last northern star, Sarah Palin, seems likely to be replaced by a new GOP star from a really cold state. Why is Michelle Bachmann creating such a stir, and who is she?

Deemed a “Tea Party Darling” Bachmann is staunch about the need for tax reform and major defense of the Constitution. She also is adamant that the Healthcare reform bill has been a gross example of government growing too quickly in the wrong direction. One of the most interesting features about her is her parallel to Sarah Palin. The similarities between the two do not stop at both of them being from frigidly cold states. Both seem to have plenty of missteps and misconceptions that plague their speeches and public opinions. Michelle Bachmann wasn’t sure where the battle of Lexington and Concord happened and Sarah Palin was unclear who it was that warned everyone of the British coming.  Clearly they are not history experts, but it is possible to be president even if you aren’t a history buff. After all, the Whitehouse does have Wi-fi. Why they didn’t use google before they publicly spoke is probably another similarity between the two.

Anyone who watched the CNN Debate, perhaps the most memorable moment was when Michelle Bachmann announced that she plans to run for president. The second most memorable moment was when she mentioned many times that she has 23 foster children, whether it pertained to the question or not. We know more about what she’s against, rather than what she’s for. We know that she’s anti-abortion, gay marriage, increased taxes, government spending, health care reform, and what she defines as big government.

It will be difficult for her to run on what she’s against rather than telling the American people what she is for and what she wants to do. She’s pretty extreme and lacks a good amount of substance. Some controversy surrounds her in the form of farm subsidies and she still has the problems of those gaffes. All in all it will be interesting to see what happens with Michelle Bachmann. My humble prediction is that the lesson was learned with her political double, Sarah Palin. The GOP will select more carefully this time which candidate will be chosen.

Right now at http://thevotereffect.com Michelle Bachmann is an issue. The first question being, “Do you support Michelle Bachmann as the GOP Candidate?” Currently 77% of the users do not support her as the candidate. That means only a mere 23% support her. The second issue being, “Should Michelle Bachmann debate a 16 year old girl?” A shocking 85% of users thought that she should debate a 16 year old girl. Not entirely sure what message that sends.  Go to http://thevotereffect.com and vote for yourself. It is free, fun, and educational. Leave a comment and make your opinion known!  

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Wal-Mart Wins, Women Lose

Today, the shocking Supreme Court Ruling in Dukes vs. Wal-Mart resulted in what is being called a step backwards in gender equality for women. The decision to not certify Dukes as a class action suit was unanimous. So what is this about and what does it all mean? Basically, Wal-Mart wins. Women Lose. Wal-Mart wins. We all lose.

Beating up on Wal-Mart has become a national past time. No one seems happy about Wal-Mart’s destruction of Main Street, decimation of the mom and pop neighborhood store, and generally driving down wages in countless communities all over the United States. Harsh criticisms about Wal-Mart’s refusal to allow their employees to unionize while obviously bulldozing over Little Town, USA all in the name of bringing low prices to the American people.  However, guiltily, most of us shop the discount giant. Possibly many of us exclusively shop Wal-Mart or Sam’s Club, present company embarrassingly included. I could make excuses, but basically Sam’s Club is near my house and I dig buying in volume. I want to know when I buy toilet paper that I won’t have to buy it again for another 6 months. Excuses or not, I don’t love my decision to give them my business.

Okay, so I’m not the world’s hugest Wal-Mart fan. I find it highly annoying that their stores have the lowest prices on groceries.  We as a society sacrifice so much for these low prices. If I were to get petty, which I will, I’d have to point out that I hate when their prices end in $0.96. Traditionally prices end in $0.99 or $0.00. Really? $0.04? Doesn’t seem worth it.  Okay, I’m just being a jerk. I’m certain that Wal-Mart has done plenty for the communities they are a part of. I mean, for one, they do provide low prices for groceries and any other item that you could possibly think of. So why would 1.5 million women attempt to file a class action suit against this store that is seen in nearly every American community?

Rewind to 1996. A woman by the name of Stephanie Odle was told by a supervisor that a male co-worker was paid more because of his need to provide for his wife and his kids. This is the first of many cases for countless women nationwide. Women have been told to “doll up” and sweep “the cobwebs” off of their makeup. Not only offensive comments such as these, but many women have watched as younger men with less experience have been promoted above them. The data supports that in fact women have been promoted less despite stronger evaluation records. They have also been paid less across the country. Sounds to me like Wal-Mart is saying boys are better than girls.

This doesn’t really seem like an argument that should be occurring in 2011. Basically it boils down to that even though the arguments of the women seem compelling the monetary size of the class action suit is too large. Lower courts have ruled in favor of Dukes, but because Wal-Mart kept appealing they made it to the highest court and won. Now the only option for the 1.5 million women violated by Wal-Mart is that they can file individual lawsuits. Sadly, none of the stories of these women have been told in a court of law. They’ve been simply trying to get a court to certify that this indeed is a viable class action suit. That was denied today by the highest court in the land.

This issue is being discussed at http://thevotereffect.com currently. The question being do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court’s case. Undoubtedly this Supreme Court made a statement. Whether that statement be that they feel big corporations have more of a say than individual citizens, or that this case was simply too big, a statement was made.  Honestly, this decision was disappointing, but it is not the last that will be heard of this case. The American people are all ears and will be watching what happens.

Additional information and sources:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/06/20/featherstone.walmart.lawsuit/

http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011/06/20/wal_mart_sex_discrimination_supreme_court_rules_class_action_can.html

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Spitin' in the Wind

Being a political junkie I love debates. Any kind of political debates. There is something about candidates attacking one another and pointing out flaws that really makes campaigns what they are. After all candidates themselves aren’t going to tell us their own flaws so it is crucial that their opponents point them out. Interestingly, the only candidate’s flaws pointed out during the GOP Debate in New Hampshire was Obama.

The GOP Candidates were united on all typical GOP issues. They were all strongly prolife, pro private sector job creation, pro lowering taxes, against gay marriage, and pro business tax breaks. Candidates didn’t really point out any issues they felt differently about as compared to the other candidates. Briefly Romney was attacked for his “Romneycare” or “Obamneycare.” Pawlenty was given the opportunity to explain himself for tokening the term Obamneycare. Relatively little bantering for 2 hours of debate.

While some may argue that the united GOP candidate field was refreshing, it is interesting when you look at past campaigns. Arguably it was Clinton who did the most vetting of Barack Obama in 2008. She brought out everything that any GOP Candidate would have brought out once the general election took place. Certainly Obama did the same for her. Had she gained the nomination there would have been little that any GOP Candidate could have brought out against her. This was clearly missing during the New Hampshire Debate. Candidates were united in the front of not liking Obama. Which was entirely a waste of time. It is obvious that none of them like Obama because if they liked him they would not be running against him. Thus, every word uttered against him was like spitting into the wind. Pointless.

GOP Candidates made a fatal error by not coming out strongly against each other rather than just coming out against Obama. Surely the GOP constituents aren’t looking for the candidate who most hates Obama and his policies. Rather, aren’t they looking for the candidate with the policies they most believe in? If you watched the debates and a candidate particularly resonated with you, comment and let us know what you think. Then, go to http://thevotereffect.com and join. Become a positive change in the future of politics, while informing yourself about all political topics.  

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

When Weiner is More than a Last Name

Who doesn't love a good Washington politician scandal? They are classically intriguing. Nothing gets the country going like a good case of a congressman having a crazy affair, taking naked pictures of themselves, or disappearing for extended periods of time. No matter what the scandal Americans love to follow their trials and tribulations. The most recent: Anthony Weiner. Unless you are living somewhere with no internet, phone, or TV access you know the story. New York Representative sends tweets of his private parts to some girl out in cyberspace. He obviously gets caught, lies, tells the truth, then apologizes for lying to the public, his wife, and even Bill Clinton. Now the plot thickens. He REFUSES to resign.

Currently on http://thevotereffect.com 89% of the users believe that Weiner should resign from his position in Congress. Some of the comments include his pure stupidity as a reason for his resignation, while others believe that Bill Clinton didn’t resign, so why should he? Another issue on The Voter Effect is that recently three other Congressmen have been involved in indiscretions and they have all resigned. Lee, Ensign, and Sanford were all forced to resign so why isn’t anyone forcing Weiner’s resignation?

The facts are that once a political figure participates in an act of indiscretion they lose their party affiliation. Once Weiner was busted sending the lewd photos the Democrats didn’t want to touch him with a ten foot poll. The same thing happened with Lee, Ensign, and Sanford. Once they were caught red handed the Republican Party dropped them like a hot potato. The reason being that there is nothing partisan about an affair or sending of genitals in a picture. Once you do that, you are on your own. Completely on your own. The Democrats are working their tail ends off to get Weiner to resign as much as the Republicans are calling for it. Let’s face it, he’s making everyone look bad.

Weiner is known as a DC outsider anyway. He’s never really done what everyone expects him to do. He’s often known as a media hog, outspoken, brash, and not really one to walk party lines. For someone with a vast group of online friends, in DC he really is surrounded by himself. According to the NY Times he ultimately is being advised by himself, which is dangerous in itself. As of late he hasn’t made the best decisions. He has been belligerent in his decision to not resign and although he initially lied to the public stating that he was the victim of a hacker, he still really seems to think that he needs to be forgiven and keep his position. Resign or not Weiner is politically changed forever. He probably won’t be elected mayor of New York which was his next endeavor.

In the end it is completely mind boggling that these men spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get elected into office. They spend countless hours convincing their constituents that they are the “right” person for the job. With all of this time and money spent on becoming elected one would think that it wouldn’t be thrown away with some ridiculous decision. Now, I’m not a political mastermind, but I would know enough to not send pictures of myself in compromising positions to a young woman, who is a stranger. Let alone send the pictures via the INTERNET creating digital record that is hard to delete or deny. Maybe someone needs to encourage these men to communicate with these women via snail mail and pay phones. That would at least be significantly less blatant and traceable.

To join the conversation go to http://thevotereffect.com and comment on all issues Weiner. 

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

What's With Mitt Romney?

Just look at the man. Mitt Romney exudes a sort of presidential air about him. He looks presidential. He’s tall, nice smile, fabulous hair, well spoken, and even the way he carries himself makes one believe that he could in fact be president. After all he looks the part, and that is half the battle. Right?

Despite how “presidential” he may seem Romney is faced with his own problems in the presidential 2012 GOP battlefield. One glaring problem that is haunting him from his days as Massachusetts governor is the health care reform plan from 2006 that he signed into law. This law mandates that every citizen of Massachusetts have state-government-regulated healthcare. Additionally it subsidizes healthcare for those who may not be able to afford healthcare. Those who do not obtain healthcare are forced to pay tax penalties. Romney received applause from many people for signing this bipartisan law into effect. Both Republicans and Democrats seemed satisfied with the efforts in 2006. Now, however, Mitt Romney is not receiving the same applause for his efforts. In fact he’s downright criticized for ever even supporting the idea.  

Many analysts agree that healthcare will be the proverbial nail in the coffin for Romney in 2012. Despite his taboo bill signing in 2006 it is argued that Romney does have some political assets to his credit. First and foremost being the fact that he was elected governor as a Republican in a dominantly blue state. He has bipartisan tendencies, which is arguably what our country needs right now. Granted when he left office his approval rating was 43%, but that still isn’t bad for a state that typically goes Democrat.

Romney is also often noted as the hero of the economy. Possibly due to his own economic success. Despite his criticism of Obama’s job growth in May, Romney didn’t have the greatest job growth by his own rights when he was governor of Massachusetts. His state in fact rated 47^th in job growth. Also, when googled “Mitt Romney economy” brings up only articles that discuss Romney’s attacks on Obama for his economic decisions and very little about what Romney plans to do for the economy if elected. His personal net worth is between $190 and $250 million which argues that he must know something about money.

Currently the frontrunner in the GOP battle for the presidential bid Romney still has battles to overcome. Beyond healthcare another issue is his religion. He is not part of the typically Christian Coalition of the GOP. 

His religion, although not often mentioned, will undoubtedly be problematic for Romney.

Http://thevotereffect.com has two issues about Mitt Romney right now. The first being, “Does Mitt Romney excite you as a political candidate?” The second being, “Will Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith hurt him as a candidate?” Go to http://thevotereffect.com and vote on both of these issues now. You can also give comments and opinions to share with other voters. This site is an excellent way to become politically active, informed, and connected! Join the Effect!

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

What is Sarah Palin Doing?

The media is a buzz with Sarah Palin as she scoots around Washington DC this Memorial Day weekend on the back of a motorcycle. This is the kick off for her bus tour in which details are very sketchy. The purpose of the tour seems odd. Titled the “One Nation Tour” she is launching a campaign to “Educate and energize Americans about our nation’s founding principles, in order to promote the Fundamental Restoration of America.” All this with her family in tow. Lofty goals for a former vice presidential candidate.

I do not have an issue with Sarah Palin wanting to educate American’s about its founding principles or really anything for that matter. I think that educating Americans is a noble act in any form. However, I’m greatly confused by Sarah Palin’s intentions. Part of me wants to believe that she simply wants to check out the east coast historical sites, and teach people about fundamentally restoring America. However, it just doesn’t exactly add up.  It seems odd that she would want to launch this bus tour that she claims is not a tour bus, stating that, "This isn't a campaign bus, this is a bus to be able to express to America how much we appreciate our foundation.”

Seems like a big bus and a big deal just to express thanks. Seems awful campaigny to me. Pair the bus with speeches, very public stops, and pandering to the likes of bikers and veterans this just feels like she wants to be running for president. Although her comment was that she’s still “contemplating that.”

Today she’s going to be in Philadelphia, but the rest of her trip details are pretty out there. If you visit her website advertised on the side of her bus http://sarahpac.com you will not find an itinerary, rather you find information about Palin along with a request for donations. It seems strange that she needs to request donations for essentially a family vacation.

 Basically, if she isn’t planning to launch a campaign then she’s really wasting lots of time and money. Secondly, if she is planning to launch a campaign it seems ridiculous that she isn’t even giving significant media interviews and drawing attention to real campaign issues. She does immediately have media attention. All eyes seem to be on her instantly whenever she decides to do anything. I guess I just am looking for more answers in regards to what this whole tour means. Does it mean she’s going to run or is this just some pre-run run, or is it simply an educational tour? Which also raises a question. How is she qualified to educate about the foundations of America?

Do you think that Sarah Palin is going to run for 2012 or not? Please go visit http://thevotereffect.com and visit this issue and answer this question. Interact with others who agree or disagree with you politically. Join the effect!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/30/palin-swings-national-archives-presidential-plans-remain-mystery/?test=latestnews

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

The Appeal of the Donald

A couple of weeks ago Donald Trump announced the he will not be running for the GOP nomination in 2012. I was quite frankly not surprised about this announcement. Do I like Donald Trump? I’m sure you are just dying to know this humble blogger’s opinion. As an entertainer? Yes. As a political candidate? Not hardly. However, the past couple of weeks have me reflecting on Trump as we’ve seen him the past few months and 

I have come to terms with him and some of the things that he said.

Donald Trump was never going to run for office. A presidential candidate has a lengthy financial disclosure form to fill out. Actually form is not completely true. It is more like a financial disclosure book they have to fill out. That alone would cause the multi-billionaire who has filed for bankruptcy to shy away from the candidacy. He was never planning on running for president.

 I think most Americans were well aware of that fact. Donald Trump loves nothing more than publicity. He doesn't even care if he sounds a little crazy to get it. Just look at his hair. He’s not afraid of critics, that’s for sure. That is where the charisma of Trump comes in. Because he never planned on running for president he had the freedom to say whatever struck him. He was not concerned about upsetting anyone. He wasn’t trying to get elected; he was trying to get attention. He achieved his goal in short order. He had the attention of all major media outlets, most of the American people, Twitter, and even the President of the United States. Not bad for a reality TV star/entrepreneur.

Other candidates could learn from Trump. Not the outlandish comments that he made. Most people didn't agree with the pressure he put on Obama to release the long form of his birth certificate. However, what they could learn from is his willingness to share his opinion no matter what others thought. I believe that we mostly saw and heard the real opinions of Donald Trump. I do not think we often get the real opinions of candidates. They live in fear of not getting elected. Candidates, I challenge you to run as if you don’t care if you get elected. Say what’s on your mind no matter what anyone thinks, and let us know the real you. 

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Political Frustration

I have to admit. I am typically very positive about our political officials. I believed long before the Gabby Gifford’s tragedy that Congress people have a difficult and dangerous job. I have always believed that they wanted what was best for the United States and take their job seriously. I’ve often felt that in the general scheme of the United States they really don’t make THAT much money for the important job they do. However, I’m feeling quite different at this point. Mostly in part to following the government much more closely on http://thevotereffect.com.

Through my monitoring of this site I am quite frankly annoyed and disappointed in Congress. Seems to me that they have accomplished very little, budget compromise aside, this session and I’m beginning to feel that very little is usually accomplished in Congress. I’m also beginning to greatly understand the phrase, “It will take an act of Congress.”  Anytime I feel like the ball might be rolling and important conversations might be starting it is time for a House or Senate recess. They seem to recess more than they work. How’s that for a cynical statement?

I often used to be frustrated by people who liked to rip on the government, but I find myself becoming one of those people. When becoming informed I think that the outrageousness of our government really becomes apparent and glaring. First, we have partisan battles waging when we face a major crisis if we do not raise the debt ceiling. Additionally, we face a crisis education that has not been addressed despite the fact that it was an Obama campaign promise along with countless other representatives. Lastly, if you watch any form of news all that is being talked about right now is the 2012 presidential candidates. Yes, 2012 is right around the corner, but I think that so much more could be done long before that. The American people wait patiently as Congress does whatever it is that Congress does and really get very little return on our vote for them.

I know that I sound grouchy right now because I am.  The good news is that with all of my frustrations lead me to a logical and comforting solution. I can keep track of my Congressperson easily and make sure that they are doing what I sent them to do. I do this through The Voter Effect. http://thevotereffect.com is a site where anyone can follow bills, vote on bills, and track and follow their representatives. Becoming informed is the key to becoming a more informed citizen. Many say that ignorance is bliss, however, I find it incredibly important to be informed. Information is really bliss, and having access to information about our government that is unbiased is relatively new for the American people. It is time for all of us to get informed, get involved, and maybe get a little outraged. It is time for Washington to change rather than Washington changing everyone who goes there. This change will be driven by social media and http://thevotereffect.com is just the change social media can bring.

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

A Letter to the President

Dear President Obama,

During the 2008 election you revolutionized campaigning by tapping into social networking sites and generating a following that has never been tapped into before.  Through your use of email, Facebook, Myspace, texting, and Youtube you were able to captivate an audience that was relatively untouched by your opposing party and candidates. Undoubtedly you were able to receive information and feedback from using these sites when typically you would not have had the opportunity to receive this information.  Would it not be great to have access to a social networking site that blends politics, giving legislators and political leaders’ access to real time information while they are in office?

You might be interested to know that a site exists that does just that while is revolutionizing the way constituents interact with their government. The site is called The Voter Effect (http://thevotereffect.com) This site is social networking meets politics in a most interesting way.  The people who use the site are given access to bills that are introduced in Congress. Members of the site are able to vote on the bills and that information is then passed onto their representatives. Representatives can receive real-time information on bills that are in Congress. In addition to bills users at The Voter Effect are able to raise issues. Issues that are discussed range from Bin Laden to healthcare. Through the raising of issues Representatives and other constituents are able to get a pulse on how the American people are feeling in regards to issues facing their government. Plus, our country will be stronger overall if all of our citizens become more active in their government.

You proved during the 2008 election that a vast number of people can become politically involved if those people are found, informed, and given the opportunity to give their feedback. The Voter Effect is taking this theme and inspiring people to believe that they can have a voice in their government. The site is also holding representatives accountable and showing them that can do a better job of representing their constituents and listening to them rather than special interest groups.  During your January State of the Union you charged Americans with the responsibility of following their representatives and holding their feet to the fire. The Voter Effect is helping people become more active in their government as we speak. Stop by, check it out, get access as an official today and see how people are voting and feeling about issues and bills that are facing America today!  Mr. President, we believe in your words, that “innovation will lead the way.”

Respectfully yours,

The Voter Effect

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Obama is the Hero for Today

…But, will it be enough to carry him through 2012? President Obama will go down in history as the president who did what Clinton and Bush Jr. could not do. He and his intelligence were able to take down the man behind 9-11 and numerous other terrorist attacks. Most importantly for Obama, he was able to make good on one of his campaign promises, a feat which has proved to be difficult for Obama amidst a divided Congress and the emergence of the Tea Party.

According to John Brennan, the Deputy National Security Advisor, the call Obama made “one of the gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory.” He was also quoted saying that this is a “defining moment in the war on terror.”Most Americans agree that this is an incredible victory for the military, president, and American people. Obama decided to take a risk when it wasn’t certain that they knew exactly where Bin Laden was. The timing of all this isn’t bad either considering that Obama is up for reelection in 18 months. 

Obama is not using this for his own gain. He humbly spoke about what happened and how it affects each of us as Americans. He delivered huge on one of his major campaign promises. However, he is making little to no mention about any of these points. Instead he thanks and credits the US Military forces.  In his speech he reminds us that even in our darkest moment we were united regardless of religion or where we came from as one American family after the 9-11 crisis. He reminded Americans of our resolve to protect our nation and bring those who launched the attacks to justice. He was poignant and reflective, rather than cocky and arrogant. It was one of his finest moments and most defining moments of his presidency.

Yes, there are people out there that are criticizing Obama and saying that he deserves little credit for what was done, but at this moment no matter what your political affiliation it is a time to celebrate our president for making the tough decisions, and our military for carrying out the mission. There is no time to criticize today. Plus, the comment that Obama only did this to raise his ratings is utterly ridiculous. All of that aside people will definitely take this into consideration as they have the opportunity to vote for Obama in 2012.

As Obama reminded all of us during his Sunday night speech the war on terror is not over, and it is important to remember that Bin Laden was not the only anti-American leader in the world. Rather there are more and I caution Americans before they celebrate too much. As the munchkins celebrated the killing of the Wicked Witch of the East they were not suspecting the arrival of the Wicked Witch of the West. What was worse for the munchkins is that the Witch of the West was far worse than the Witch of the East. Although some feel safer with Bin Laden gone, it is important that we remember that he wasn’t the only and certainly won’t be the last to threaten our security. At http://thevotereffect.com the question asked was, “Is the safety of our nation at greater risk with the death of Bin Laden on our hands?” 68% of users agreed that yes, US safety is at greater risk with the death of Bin Laden on our hands.  As for the 32% who believe that our safety is not at risk I caution them to not be too confident. All in all today is a day that will be remembered for decades to come and one that will ultimately define Obama’s presidency.

According to John Brennan, the Deputy National Security Advisor, the call Obama made “one of the gutsiest calls of any president in recent memory.” He was also quoted saying that this is a “defining moment in the war on terror.”Most Americans agree that this is an incredible victory for the military, president, and American people. Obama decided to take a risk when it wasn’t certain that they knew exactly where Bin Laden was. The timing of all this isn’t bad either considering that Obama is up for reelection in 18 months. 

Obama is not using this for his own gain. He humbly spoke about what happened and how it affects each of us as Americans. He delivered huge on one of his major campaign promises. However, he is making little to no mention about any of these points. Instead he thanks and credits the US Military forces.  In his speech he reminds us that even in our darkest moment we were united regardless of religion or where we came from as one American family after the 9-11 crisis. He reminded Americans of our resolve to protect our nation and bring those who launched the attacks to justice. He was poignant and reflective, rather than cocky and arrogant. It was one of his finest moments and most defining moments of his presidency.

Yes, there are people out there that are criticizing Obama and saying that he deserves little credit for what was done, but at this moment no matter what your political affiliation it is a time to celebrate our president for making the tough decisions, and our military for carrying out the mission. There is no time to criticize today. Plus, the comment that Obama only did this to raise his ratings is utterly ridiculous. All of that aside people will definitely take this into consideration as they have the opportunity to vote for Obama in 2012.

As Obama reminded all of us during his Sunday night speech the war on terror is not over, and it is important to remember that Bin Laden was not the only anti-American leader in the world. Rather there are more and I caution Americans before they celebrate too much. As the munchkins celebrated the killing of the Wicked Witch of the East they were not suspecting the arrival of the Wicked Witch of the West. What was worse for the munchkins is that the Witch of the West was far worse than the Witch of the East. Although some feel safer with Bin Laden gone, it is important that we remember that he wasn’t the only and certainly won’t be the last to threaten our security. At http://thevotereffect.com the question asked was, “Is the safety of our nation at greater risk with the death of Bin Laden on our hands?” 68% of users agreed that yes, US safety is at greater risk with the death of Bin Laden on our hands.  As for the 32% who believe that our safety is not at risk I caution them to not be too confident. All in all today is a day that will be remembered for decades to come and one that will ultimately define Obama’s presidency.

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Mr. Trump, You’re being Ridiculous!

I think everyone is hesitant to take on The Donald. Especially given what happened to Rosie O’Donnell during the 2006 fight where Trump personally, professionally, and even financially threatened her on television. All this because O’Donnell gave her opinion on Trump giving a beauty queen a second chance. I have written one other blog about Trump and swore no more no matter HOW MUCH he tries to work his way into the spotlight. I vowed I was done giving him my attention in anyway shape or form. However, this week I feel that Trump was utterly ridiculous. Ridiculous to the point of offensive. Sometimes you just go too far, you know? So despite what we’ve seen happen before when someone calls Trump out, I’m calling him out.

 No one would argue that Trump is opinionated and oftentimes ruthless. He says what he means, and means what he says. Obviously he’s gained all new traction with his recent birther movement, DEMANDING that Obama show his birth certificate. (Yes, in addition to the one he’s already shown that Trump did not deem worthy enough.) So Obama eventually gives into the birthers, despite telling them numerous times that they had too much to do to worry about items so trivial, and sends his lawyer to Hawaii to obtain a copy of the long form of the birth certificate. Beaming with pride, Trump credits himself for being the only one who could ever make this happen. Just when we think Trump can’t top his “beating a dead horse issue” for the year he decides to start an additional campaign. To get Obama’s grades and figure out WHY he would ever be welcomed into an ivy league for no other reason than affirmative action. Quite frankly I find it disgusting.

If Trump would like to attack Obama then attack on the issues. There are many, many issues to attack him on that are relevant and actually pertinent to his reelection. Making a big deal out of an issue like his birthplace or grades is so 2008. Attack on the real issues, such as the fact that Obama promised to close Guantanamo, promised to raise taxes on the richest of Americans, or promised to end no-bid contracts for over $25,000 all of which are campaign promises broken. Those are issues where Trump could gain some ground against Obama. Real ground. Not petty fake ground where he only rallied those who believe in conspiracy theories. If he wants to attack the man attack him with the truth, not waste of time lies.

Currently at http://thevotereffect.com a couple issues surrounding Trump have been voted and commented upon. The first being, “Is Donald Trump a viable presidential candidate?” According to The Voter Effect users, 72.6% say no, 27.4% saying yes. Check out the full issue and comment here: http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/ That’s close to only a quarter of users agreeing that Trump would make a good candidate. Early last week the issue was raised, “Is the birther issue old?” http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/ Overwhelmingly 79.2% said yes it is old while only a mere 20.8% said no it isn’t old. You can vote on this issue and countless others as well as comment  at http://thevotereffect.com.

I’m not sure what Trump will do. He may keep crying foul on Obama and yip at his ankles like a maladjusted yorkie demanding the attention of the president. Or he may wake up and realize that in fact this country does have bigger fish to fry than if our president made the grades to get into Harvard. I hazard a guess that the GOP cringes when Trump aligns himself with their party because quite frankly I doubt that many of the true members of the GOP agree with anything that he’s doing at this point. Many people don’t have jobs, we are in two wars with an unstable Middle East, crazy weather keeping everyone on their toes, and a Congress that has done next to nothing since they began their session in January. So, Mr. Trump we don’t have time for your antics, name calling, and busywork creating for the President. Please move on and talk about something serious for a change.  

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Gas Price Blues

Perhaps one of the most frustrating issues is the raising of gas prices. It is oppressive to people who work low paying jobs. It takes money out of the pockets of people who may use that money to buy other items. On top of it all it adds to the prices of goods like bread, milk, and other groceries. If you live in the Midwest or an area without public transportation you are in fact stuck. Besides carpooling, options are limited and everyone feels the pinch. Barack Obama recently came out against the big oil companies demanding that other countries increase their supplies now that the Middle East is in crisis.  Even John Boehner was on ABC Nightly News discussing his dissention with gas companies and prices. The question remains, why are gas prices so high, and what in the world can we do about them?

Why so High?

Pretty much everyone knows that once the conflict in Libya and Egypt started gas prices began to rise more rapidly. Additionally, the summer travel season is approaching which also signals an increase in gas prices. Still, how do these events contribute to the rise in gas prices? It all has to do with speculation. See, when conflict arose in the Middle East that made investors get a little scared. They were afraid that demand would outweigh supply causing a situation where traders buy future contracts which are agreements to sell oil on a future date at a specific price. This in part was done due to the declining US dollar. Basically the traders can bid up the price of oil and create a situation where even though the demand is not outweighing the supply they make it so the prices go up and blame it on events such as Libya and Egypt.

Drill Baby Drill

As hopeless as the gas crisis may seem solutions are thrown out now and again that provide food for thought if nothing else. “Drill baby drill” is the battle cry of many members of the GOP. It does seem like a logical idea. If we open drilling in areas of the US then we will increase the amount of supply, thus lowering the demand, and in turn lowering prices. What is really overlooked in this scenario is the fact that the oil drilled in the US would enter the global oil market, not just the US market. Since we would produce relatively small amounts of oil in comparison to the rest of the world it probably wouldn’t make much of a difference in the end. In short it would be like throwing a pebble into the ocean. Alternative fuels seem to be discussed frequently, but diesel is even more expensive than gasoline currently. Biodiesel seems like a genius idea, but I’m not sure how that fuel would work with cars that only take gas. Who wants to make the investment to make it so their car can take alternative fuels and is that even possible?

What do you do?

During the gas crises most of us see our hard earned dollars go into our gas tank, grateful for the ability to drive to our job, get a paycheck and put another big chunk into our gas tanks. Undoubtedly this is frustrating, but ingenuity is the child of necessity so my question is what do you do when the gas prices are high? What changes do you make? Comment here or go to http://thevotereffect.com. Learn what other people are doing during this tight money crunch. Also comment on the issue: Is Barack Obama doing enough to lower gas prices? Does he need to be doing more?

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Raise the Roof (Or the Debt Ceiling)

After finally coming to terms with a budget for 2011 almost immediately attention turned to what to do with the debt ceiling. It seems that the debt ceiling is something that should be raised without little debate. The Republicans are pledging that they will not raise the debt limit without significant changes to current government spending levels. Democrats warn the Republicans to not play on this issue like they did the budget, dragging it out to the eleventh hour. Sounds like typical political banter, but obviously we need to pay our bills, right? Seems fairly straightforward that the debt ceiling will need to be raised and soon. If it is not raised before July we (meaning the whole world) will face catastrophic consequences. Despite these warnings according to a NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll 62% of Americans say DO NOT raise the debt ceiling. Now, let’see…Democrats and Republicans alike believe that we need to raise the debt ceiling, economists say it needs to be raised, what do 62% of the American people not know about the debt ceiling?  

What’s the Point?

Tom Coburn, US Senator from Oklahoma made an interesting point on Sunday’s Meet the Press. He states, “A debt limit doesn’t really mean anything because we’ve always extended it.” If we always extend the limit why do we even have one? The debt ceiling was actually established in 1917. This was established because prior to 1917 Congress had to gain approval every time they wanted to borrow money. Once in World War I began it became crucial that Congress had the ability to approve borrowing in a quicker manner. Basically the federal government was given approval to borrow as long as it remained under the limit of the debt ceiling. Currently the debt limit is $14.3 Trillion. This point will be reached on May 16^th with the breaking point happening on July 8^th. The debt ceiling has been raised relatively drama free for nearly 100 times, most recently in February 2010. So pretty much a debt ceiling is a reminder to the American people that the government is approaching the point where the feds have to ask before they can borrow more, but pretty much they will make it so they raise that amount anyway.

It has to be Done

Both sides agree that the debt ceiling must be raised. It is the terms that they do not agree on. We hear it over and over again that spending is at an all time 50 year high. Entitlements need to be cut, we need to raise taxes on people making over $250,000 per year, we need to eliminate tax loopholes for the very rich, we need to cut defense spending, or we need to get rid of programs. The constant debate and political posturing never seems to end. The facts are whether either side gets what they want the debt ceiling will have to be raised, so why don’t the politicians spare us the rhetoric, raise the ceiling, and then continue on with their battles. What it boils down to is that the Democrats seem to think that $2.2 Trillion is needed to get us through the year and Republicans want $1.9 Trillion to get us through this year and half of 2012. Seems close enough, or at least close enough to find a compromise, without dragging other issues into it. The hard facts are that if the debt ceiling is not raised then the US will not be paying their debts to other countries. If they are not paying their debts it could cause a global financial crisis. In short, the US has to pay their bills or everyone will pay in the end. Regardless if the debt ceiling is raised or not the debt will still be there.  

Why are we Here?

If 62% of people do not agree with raising the debt ceiling even though it virtually has to be done many of them would probably like to know why in the world we are even in this situation. Here’s the breakdown. Past 11 years, 2 wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) numerous tax cuts while at war ($4.36 Trillion), and one big ($3.9 Trillion) economic stimulus. Arguably all things that at the time the American people did not think that we could live without. As David Gregory stated on Meet the Press, “The American people want more government than they want to pay for.” Now isn’t the time for the debate on spending, rather it is a time for the parties to get it together and do what needs to be done.

To vote on the debt ceiling and more go to http://thevotereffect.com/

Special thanks to:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/whats-the-debt-ceiling-and-why-is-everyone-in-washington-talking-about-it/2011/04/15/AFSS4R1D_story.html

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Education is the Elephant in the Room

As the budget battle for 2011 is finally settled and the fight for the budget of 2012 is only beginning the question begging to be answered is, will this Congress accomplish anything besides the budget this year? Ultimately many issues are on the table unanswered and in desperate need of attention. Perhaps the most pressing of those issues is Education. Education is perhaps one of the biggest fights nationwide right now. The fight being between the lawmakers and the teachers combined with the unions. The fight does NOT seem to be getting any better; rather, the fight seems to be getting worse.

This past summer I had a conversation with a teacher. She was furious with the Obama administration over what they had or rather had not done with education. Her words have remained etched in my brain, “I stood out in the November rain holding signs for this guy, getting people to the polls, encouraging my friends to vote for him, and what do we get? Race to the top, more No Child Left Behind, more blame on teachers, and nothing in the way of the less testing we were promised.” I have thought of this teacher often especially in light of all the states revamping their budgets and trying to “bust unions.” She worked so hard to elect a person she felt would make the teacher profession better and in reality teachers are probably in some of the worst circumstances they have faced in decades.

Chris Christie

Tough talking New Jersey Governor has been outspoken about his views on teacher tenure. He states, “Lifetime job protections for public school educators hurt children in the classroom.” He has also viciously attacked the New Jersey Teacher’s union calling them “political thugs.” Teachers are up in arms about these comments and even speak out against his call to teachers to sacrifice with budget issues. Teachers are up in arms about the call for them to sacrifice as Christie gives tax breaks to the very wealthy. On ABC News Chris Christie calls for teachers to have a union that is as good as they are. He even calls teachers hard-working and dedicated. Is Chris Christie so wrong? Do school districts need to look at tenure? Are unions protecting bad teachers?

Some Stats

According to the documentary Waiting for Superman 1 out of every 57 doctors lose their license to practice medicine. Lawyers experience a 1 in 97 loss of licensure. Teachers have much better odds of keeping their jobs. Only 1 in 1,000 teachers are fired due to poor performance. It is hard to believe that standards are that low for teachers or teachers are all doing a fantastic job. Quite frankly I think that education is missing the point. We need a valid way to assess and determine what a good or bad teacher actually is. Only 1 in every 1,000 teachers are fired. Based upon the fact that we hear over and over again that our schools are failing it is important to look at the fact that we seem to be keeping the same people in place and expecting different results, teachers not making a difference, and administrators not identifying struggling teachers.

Race to Where?

During the 2008 election Barack Obama was adamant that the profession of education needed to be elevated, which included putting America’s best and brightest in front of our children. He also was clear that one test should not determine the success or failure of a school or individual teacher. What was President Obama’s answer? Race to the Top.  Race to the Top was a grant competition for states to gain money for trying out a “new” idea to raise achievement in a way that could be scaled up to a national level or utilized in other states. The idea of having to compete for money for education which is a right to every child in this country angered most states, and teachers, who felt cheated by this allocation of education funds.  Race to the Top funding was saved during the recent 11^th hour budget fight. A popular quote about Race to the Top is that, “Education is not a race.”

In all Fairness

Teachers have a tough job. In addition to doing a tough job they rarely receive feedback for what they are doing. Their administrators or direct supervisors have little understanding of what is happening within the walls of their classroom. Parents lack involvement and are often too busy or too involved in other activities to even play a role in their child’s education. School boards often are out of touch with the classroom and yet they control so much of what happens to schools. Lastly, President Obama made big promises to education, specifically teachers when education is historically a state issue. States fund and regulate education within their states. Also, NCLB was in place long before President Obama took office. No one really likes it, but at the same time, I’m not sure anyone knows what to do with it. The short answer is that education needs to be overhauled in a way that is so drastic many wouldn’t even know where to begin.

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!

Budget Woes

Let’s face it. Making a budget is a drag…We all have to do it. Even the Federal Government. This year the budget has been news since it wasn’t ready when the 2011 session of Congress took office. The GOP and Tea Party wanted to cut, cut, cut. The Dems wanted to keep the cuts slim because they wanted ensure that economic growth continues. The government has been issuing continuing resolutions and stopgap spending measures to avert a government shutdown. The last was issued in the final hours before the government would shut down.  Days after the averted shut down both Dems and the GOP praised themselves for coming together and compromising to make a budget deal. The question I had was…What was the compromise? Finding exactly what was up for discussion was uncertain. Programs ultimately were threatened which arguably would translate into job loss. However, what was saved at the eleventh hour of the budget discussions and what was still cut?

Bob Schieffer of CBS’s Face the Nation described the politics of the budget cuts as miniscule in comparison to the vastness of the US budget. He states, “If you were buying a house for $200,000 it would be like arguing over $400. That’s what the argument over the government budget is.” Even though the fight is over a small amount, it sure did create a stir.

What is in the Budget?

The article below has good information about what is in and what is out in the budget. It is rather long so I will provide snippets of information from the article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/38-billion-in-cuts-in-budget-deal-will-cover-various-domestic-areas/2011/04/11/AFJihQMD_story.html

·         Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services Departments will have combined cuts of $19.8 Billion.

·         Environmental Protection Agency will lose $1.6 Billion

·         Fish and Wildlife Service $141 Million in cuts

·         National Park Servicelost $127 Million.

·         Clean drinking water state revolving funds will lose $997 Million.

·         Head Start, AmeriCorps, and implementation of new health-care and food safety laws will stay.

·         Pell Grants will be cut by $500 Million.

·         Children’s Health Insurance Program will lose roughly $3.5 Billion.

·         Money for highways and high-speed rail projects in rural areas will face cuts.

·         Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan and the Free Choice Voucher programs (COOPS program) from Obama’s health-care law will be eliminated, which eliminates $2.2 Billion from health care spending.

·         The Washington DC Metro system will not be cut and receive full funding.

·         Attached to the bill is a provision that bans federal and local funding for abortion.

Again, these are simply the highlights. For a full discussion of the cuts click here:  http://republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/41211SummaryFinalFY2011CR.pdf

What do people think?

The budget has spent lots of time being discussed and cussed since Congress started their session in January. At http://thevotereffect.com there is a discussion happening right now that you could take part in. http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/?page=issues_search. It has been particularly interesting to follow these debates since the beginning of the budget discussions and how the users of http://thevotereffect.com responded to them. For instance the first budget discussion happened when the Tea Party suggested $100 Billion in cuts and the GOP suggested $74 Billion in cuts. The users at http://thevotereffect.com voted 37.5% against the Tea Party’s suggestion, while 62.7% voted in favor. http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/?page=issue_profile&issue_id=92. Read the full discussion here. Another budget discussion is http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/?page=issue_profile&issue_id=163 which asks if the budget should’ve be cut by the $61 Billion suggested by the GOP or the $30 Million suggested by the Dems. What it boiled down to was 40.7% opposing the $61 Billion in cuts and 53.3% in favor of the cuts. Also being discussed is the aspect of Defense spending. http://www.thevotereffect.com/public_issues/?page=issue_profile&issue_id=130. It has been extremely interesting to watch this debate unfold and to follow what fellow Americans are thinking at http://thevotereffect.com . Join today. It’s free and fun!

Go to Washington every, single, day. Join http://thevotereffect.com today!http://thevotereffect.com/